The NHS is Indoctrinating Staff
James Esses’ Substack goes out to thousands of subscribers in over 80 countries. Become a paid subscriber to support James’ investigative journalism, gain access to his full archive of articles, and have the ability to post comments and join the conversation.
The story I am about to tell you is one of the most shocking I have come across in the years that I have been exposing ideological indoctrination. It reveals, as clear as day, that our NHS is utterly captured, possibly beyond repair.
In Spring 2025, I was contacted by a whistleblower – a staff member from East Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation Trust. I was told:
“I attended an LGBTQIA+ Awareness session organised by NHS.
The trainer encouraged open discussion in what she described as a ‘safe space’, so I participated by asking questions and expressing views in line with my protected beliefs.
The trainer was pushing transgender ideology propaganda. I had serious concerns about the content of the session especially safeguarding concerns over women, children and transgender patients and was worried about what the NHS are teaching their staff.”
The training delivered to the whistleblower and colleagues was part of an ongoing NHS Trust programme on ‘diversity and inclusion’. It was arranged by the internal ‘LGBTQ+ Network’.
My whistleblower recorded the entire thing and leaked it to me. I have listened to it in full. The recording has revealed that this NHS Trust is offering ‘training’ that misrepresents UK law, NHS England policies, and safeguarding protocols, as well as raising serious concerns about patient safety and child safeguarding. Modules included:
· ‘LGBTQ+: Breaking the Binary/Removing the Barriers’
· ‘Social and Legal Transition’
· ‘Medical and Surgical Transition’
I am only able to reveal the details of this training now, for reasons that will become apparent shortly. My whistleblower has asked to remain anonymous, for fear of reprisal.
The individual who delivered the training is one Tracy Martinez. Martinez has no experience in clinical practice, child development, or medical safeguarding. This became glaringly apparent when, throughout the training, she continuously referred to ‘prostrates’ (rather than ‘prostates’) and ‘double masectomies’ (rather than ‘double mastectomies’).
She is a self-styled trans activist and worked at the controversial LGBT organisation, Outhouse Essex, until 2023. This is an organisation that has been heavily funded through public sector grants, to the tune of hundreds of thousands of pounds.
Martinez is a highly contentious figure herself. For example, she was exposed in the national press for training teachers to recommend puberty blockers.
She also previously trained staff at a high school which later saw multiple serious sexual assaults in gender-neutral toilets.
From the very outset of the training, it was clear that this was going to be a day of indoctrination. Martinez told staff that, if they disagree with her, to “remember that you’re employed by the NHS…so you need to be a little bit careful if you’re disrespecting the things we talk about”. Shutting down dialogue before it has even begun.
All attendees were asked to go around and state their pronouns. For those who chose not to answer, they were prompted by Martinez to provide them. Hardly very inclusive. She told participants that, since Trump’s election victory, “our community are terrified” and there is “some real hateful stuff” coming from America. It was increasingly clear this wasn’t to be neutral training but rather ideological preaching.
She felt the need to inform attendees “I have a vagina” and made a point of speaking repeatedly about the fact that she is a lesbian, telling the group: “I’ve always been a lesbian… I’ve never been attracted to men…don’t ask me how I managed to stay with my husband for 15 years…”
Here are the most shocking things revealed by the leaked recording of the NHS Trust’s training:
1. Compelled Speech
Trust staff were instructed by Martinez: “I’m breaking the binary today, you’ve got to stop thinking of people as male or female”.
What about those who dare to believe in biological sex (a particularly important distinction for those working in healthcare)? They were warned: “Refusing to use a person’s correct pronouns can create a hostile work environment and may amount to discrimination under the Equality Act.”
This training pre-dates the Supreme Court judgment on biological sex. Regardless, this, of course, utterly misrepresents the Equality Act 2010 and related case-law that we have had over recent years. When it came to providing references for these assertions, Martinez cherry-picked one, non-authoritative, first-tier employment tribunal case and completely failed to mention the binding precedents set by many recent cases, including that of Forstater v CGD Europe.
The threats against those believing in biological reality continued, notwithstanding that gender-critical beliefs are expressly protected under the Equality Act 2010:
“It’s really important that we don’t tolerate staff refusing to respect a trans colleague’s identity. If someone refuses to use the correct pronouns, that should be treated as harassment and managed under HR policies.”
“If someone expresses views that make trans colleagues uncomfortable, that should be escalated through HR.”
The message to NHS staff: Dare to question gender ideology or use sex-based pronouns and your career will be at risk.
As part of this compelled speech, NHS staff were educated in the art of pronouns, including ‘Zie/Zim/Zir/Zirs/Zirself’. If they make a mistake in using such ‘neopronouns’, they are instructed to “apologise” and to offer a mea culpa by saying: “I’m not fluent in those particular pronouns”.
As if threats of internal censure were not sufficient, Martinez invoked the law, warning attendees that “misgendering is a form of hate speech and could be a criminal offence under hate crime laws.”
This is a lie. Misgendering is not a hate crime and such a suggestion flies in the face of both our legislation and guidance from the Crown Prosecution Service.
2. Undermining Same-Sex Spaces
On the topic of allowing men who identify as women to use female spaces, Martinez told staff:
“There is no risk in allowing transgender people to use spaces that match their identity. The idea that women are at risk is a myth created by anti-trans groups.”
This is gaslighting and dismissing genuinely and reasonably held concerns.
A couple of the female attendees raised concerns about this approach and the associated risks to women. They were promptly shut down, with Martinez telling them: “I’ve never known of someone being sexually assaulted by a transwoman”. Well, if she doesn’t know it, it mustn’t be true…
She followed this up with a particularly creepy and chilling statement: “You are already sharing toilets with transwomen and you won’t even know it”.
3. Undermining Child Safeguarding
Even more shocking was the complete and utter disregard for child safeguarding, especially considering that several of the attendees work in paediatrics. Staff were told:
“We must always affirm trans identities in children. Social transition is safeguarding neutral.”
Not only is this encouraging setting children on a path towards irreversible medicalisation but it completely contradicts the findings of the Cass Review, which found that social transitioning of children is not a neutral act.
Outright lies were told about puberty blockers. Martinez told NHS Trust staff that:
“Puberty blockers are a safe and reversible way to give young people time to explore their gender identity without making any permanent changes.”
“Regret is extremely rare, and detransition is almost unheard of.”
These are outright lies. Once again, they fly in the face of the Cass Review, which demonstrated that there is no evidence of reversibility and focussed on the significant regret faced by increasing numbers of detransitioners. Furthermore, it completely goes against the government announcement of an indefinite ban, which emphasised the ‘unacceptable safety risk’ of puberty blockers. Even though this is official government policy, NHS Trusts are allowing ‘trainers’ to come in and undermine this.
Martinez referred to the governmental ban on puberty blockers as “sneaky”.
In a complete affront to child safeguarding, NHS staff were instructed to keep secrets from parents. They were told: “Do not tell the parents…you could make that child unsafe…this is not a safeguarding risk”.
As well as puberty blockers, Martinez encouraged the use of breast binding and genital tucking, including for children. She told NHS staff that: “using binders can be an important part of gender affirmation for many people”.
And the expert cited on genital tucking? RuPaul. That’s right. Martinez referenced the fact that, at the end of an episode of RuPaul’s Drag Race, the host instructs: “untuck ladies”.
I wish I was joking.
4. Lies About Explorative Therapy
Not content with pushing medical transitioning, NHS staff were also in receipt of a diatribe of dangerous lies about explorative therapy that seeks to reconcile children with their bodies.
Martinez stated: “Any refusal to affirm a trans person’s identity is conversion therapy.
This contracts both the Cass Review, as well as concerns stated by the UK Council for Psychotherapy.
Martinez went on to say that: “being trans is not related to autism, trauma, or mental health conditions. These are separate issues.”
Again, this contradicts the research, including the Cass Review, which demonstrated that autism is present in almost half of all gender clinical referrals, and that significant and wide-ranging co-morbidities accompany gender dysphoria.
NHS staff are being lied to by the ‘experts’ brought in to educate them.
5. Weaponisation of Suicide
Chillingly, Martinez was even willing to weaponise fears around suicide, telling NHS staff that:
“Trans kids are at a significantly higher risk of suicide than their peers. If they are not supported in their identity, the statistics show that their risk increases dramatically.”
Again, this is a lie, entirely contradicted by the independent, government-commissioned report from Professor Louis Appleby in 2024.
There were moments throughout the training session in which attendees challenged Martinez on the lies and ideology she was spouting. Such challenges were simply shot down in front of the entire group. Martinez responded:
“I don’t want an audience that’s trying to catch me out...I’m a hundred times more expert than you are.”
“What I don’t want is people trying to discredit me or make me look bad because I’ve been doing this for decades and I know more than anyone in this room.”
Patronising. Shaming. Immature. Dangerous.
Towards the end of the training, one attendee stated that men cannot become women. Martinez responded:
“It’s alright what you think in your head but if you start voicing those type of comments…”
If anyone tries to suggest that we don’t have a free speech problem in our public institutions, show them this.
Before the lunchbreak, Martinez appeared to mock women’s concerns, saying: “I’m going to give you a break now to use the toilet of your choice”.
NHS staff were also presented with a number of concerning accompanying handouts. For example, a document on ‘gender inclusive language’ instructs staff to use the following terms:
· ‘Upper body’ instead of ‘breasts’
· ‘Erogenous or erectile tissue’ instead of ‘penis’ or ‘clitoris’
· ‘Internal gonads’ instead of ‘ovaries’
· ‘Person with prostate’ or ‘person who has a cervix’ instead of ‘male’ or ‘female’
· ‘Looks healthy’ instead of ‘looks normal’
· ‘Receptive intercourse’ instead of ‘vaginal sex’
· ‘Pregnant person’ and ‘chestfeeding’
What could have come straight from a Stonewall or Mermaids manual is being supplied to staff in the NHS.
Other resources provided to NHS staff included:
· The ‘genderbread person’;
· Book recommendations for 5-year-olds (such as ‘Julian is a Mermaid’);
· A ‘useful contacts’ sheet, which listed Mermaids (twice, for some reason), even though they were found by the Charity Commission to have been mismanaged, including in the provision of breast binders to vulnerable girls behind their parents’ backs;
· Pronoun badges.
Were it not for a brave whistleblower, the public would have no idea what is going on behind closed doors in this NHS Trust. However, we would be foolish to think that this is an isolated incident. During the training, Martinez bragged about having run hundreds of training sessions across the public sector, including in schools and the police. I have been made aware that she has continued to run such training throughout 2025 and will be doing so into 2026.
If the Labour government do not commit to rooting this dangerous ideology out of our hospitals and other institutions, it will demonstrate that they stand against the interests of the British public.
God this makes me so depressed. I have two small granddaughters and I fear for their futures where will it end when people are allowed, nay encouraged, to voice these lies.